<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Market Intelligence Blog &#187; marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://market-intel.com/blog/index.php/tag/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://market-intel.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Intelligent Approach to Marketing at www.market-intel.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 16:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing for Entrepreneurs and Small Business</title>
		<link>http://market-intel.com/blog/2010/11/12/marketing-for-entrepreneurs-and-small-business/</link>
		<comments>http://market-intel.com/blog/2010/11/12/marketing-for-entrepreneurs-and-small-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Brothers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[know your customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-intel.com/blog/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven things every start-up and small business should be doing to assure that the customers will be there, $$$ in hand, when you open for business]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent article at Yahoo Finance, “Ten Mistakes that Start-Up Entrepreneurs Make,” is a must-read for inventors, entrepreneurs and small business owners.  Mistake Number 3, in particular, rings a bell with this marketing guy:</p>
<p>“3. Spending too much time on product development, not enough on sales”</p>
<p>Most inventors and entrepreneurs – from the newest medical device, to 3-D imaging software, to a designer cupcake and cookie business – are stretched just too thin.  Under-resourced, under staffed and under-funded, the typical start-up is forced to prioritize and sacrifice … and areas often neglected are marketing and sales.  Here are 7 things every start-up and small business should be doing to assure that the customers will be there, $$$ in hand, when you open for business:</p>
<p>1.  Early, EARLY, EARLY in the life of your start-up, <strong>figure out who your likely customers will be</strong>.  Who has the passion – and the $$$ &#8211; to buy a product or service like your?  Where are you likely to find them?  And even more important, where are they mostly likely to go – on the street or on the internet &#8211; to discover a product like yours?<br />
2.  <strong>Understand what your potential customers love and what they hate</strong> about products or services like yours.  Then, emphasize the things the like, provide a solution to the things they hate, and don’t waste your time and resources on things they don’t care about<br />
3.   <strong>Test your concept</strong> – early and often.  Ideas that seem obvious on paper or in your discussions around the company coffee pot are often far less than obvious to outsiders – investors, supplier or distribution partners, and potential customers.  Entrepreneurs often fear that a competitor will ‘steal’ their idea, but for most start-ups, the much bigger danger is sinking all your hard work and $$$ into a venture that customers don’t care about.<br />
4.  Nothing can jump-start your start-up better than an early success, so <strong>Focus, FOCUS, FOCUS</strong>!  I know, that dazzling set of opportunities that you envision is seductive, but the temptation to pursue them all is an invitation to doing none of them well enough.  Pick a particular offering (or closely related family of offerings), a customer segment you know well, and a well defined distribution scheme.  Then, invest all your effort in making it work.  The credibility, confidence, publicity, and knowledge – not to mention cash flow – you gain from your first success will make it that much easier to pick off the next and the next and the next opportunity.<br />
5. <strong>Remove any hurdles that make it inconvenient for your customers</strong> to do business with you.  Take a look at your own business through the eyes of a customer:  Is it easy to find and get into your store – on the street or on the internet?  Does your website and your storefront signage clearly and succinctly explain your business?  How can I learn more about you, your product, your business?  Do you offer a convenient assortment of payment options and customer-conscious return and refund policies?<br />
Remember – What you think about your business is ultimately a lot less important than what your customers think and feel about it.<br />
6.  <strong>Share your success</strong>.  You deserve to be amply rewarded for pushing your idea to fulfillment, but don’t forget the ones who helped get your there.  It’s the right thing to do – and it’s darned good business.  The more closely that your partners’ success is linked to yours, the harder your employees, your suppliers and your distribution partners will work for yours.<br />
7.  <strong>Get to know, understand and appreciate your customers</strong>.  Organize your business so that it’s a positive, rewarding and hassle-free experience every time your customer touches you – beginning with their first phone call, email or their first step inside your store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://market-intel.com/blog/2010/11/12/marketing-for-entrepreneurs-and-small-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing Green Technologies &#8211; Part 1, for Inventors</title>
		<link>http://market-intel.com/blog/2009/07/06/marketing-green-technologies-part-1-for-inventors/</link>
		<comments>http://market-intel.com/blog/2009/07/06/marketing-green-technologies-part-1-for-inventors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Brothers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA['Green' Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-intel.com/blog/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karen posed a couple of entertwined questions over on one of the Linked-In Group discussions: &#8220;How can inventors of green products find and market to potential customers?&#8221; and &#8220;How can companies find new &#8216;green&#8217; products and evaluate their effectiveness?&#8221; For the inventor &#8212; Having been there for most of my working life, I know that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen posed a couple of entertwined questions over on one of the Linked-In Group discussions:<br />
&#8220;How can inventors of green products find and market to potential customers?&#8221;<br />
and<br />
&#8220;How can companies find new &#8216;green&#8217; products and evaluate their effectiveness?&#8221;</p>
<p>For the inventor &#8212;<br />
Having been there for most of my working life, I know that marketing even the best new product to industry isn&#8217;t easy.  Most manufacturing companies are inherently conservative and cautious about adopting new products and new designs.  And well they should be!  Their caution is certainly understandable when viewed against the company&#8217;s responsibility for the safety of workers and the community and the efficient operation of million or hundreds of millions of plant investment.</p>
<p>Wearing my marketing hat, I often emphasize the emotional, non-rational side of b2b sales.  However, in the case of new and unproven manufacturing products, it is vital to give the design engineer or maintenance leader confidence &#8211; built on hard data and credible experience &#8211; that your product won&#8217;t fail.  In many cases, the cost of a failure (to the company and to the individual career) so far outweighs the potential and uncertain benefits that they just won&#8217;t take a chance.</p>
<p>That being said, companies are always happy to find &#8216;better and cheaper&#8217;.  But in my experience, few are able to invest people resources to systematically monitor and assess new products.  More typically, engineers will look for solutions to problems as they arise.  Thus, it is vital to be visible (or memorable) when the engineer encounters the problem.  </p>
<p>Bottom line &#8211; Being in &#8216;the right place at the right time&#8217; means being in many places &#8211; print ads, internet, trades shows, customer visits &#8211; most of the time.           </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://market-intel.com/blog/2009/07/06/marketing-green-technologies-part-1-for-inventors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated &#8220;MS vs MBA&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://market-intel.com/blog/2009/06/01/updated-ms-vs-mba/</link>
		<comments>http://market-intel.com/blog/2009/06/01/updated-ms-vs-mba/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Brothers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing Research Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced degrees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linked-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-intel.com/blog/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My 28 May post &#8220;MS or MBA&#8221; created quite a lot of interesting and valuable discussion over on LINKED-IN. The question: &#8220;Would an advanced technical degree be more or less valuable than an MBA to a young professional interested in a marketing / business career in the manufacturing sector?&#8221; Here are some key themes and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 28 May post &#8220;MS or MBA&#8221; created quite a lot of interesting and valuable discussion over on <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LINKED-IN</a>.  The question: <em>&#8220;Would an advanced technical degree be more or less valuable than an MBA to a young professional interested in a marketing / business career in the manufacturing sector?&#8221;</em><br />
Here are some key themes and interesting excerpts:</p>
<p>AN ADVANCED DEGREE IS VALUABLE (Not surprising, since it seems most responders have at least one!), BUT&#8230;.<br />
&#8220;[E]xperience is worth the most in this market&#8230;.  [U]nless you can get into a top B school &#8230; it really isn&#8217;t worth it.  B school is all about the networking and Alumni network.&#8221;</p>
<p>FOR A BUSINESS / MARKETING CAREER, BREADTH of KNOWLEDGE TRUMPS DEPTH<br />
&#8220;My MBA has broadened my career opportunities and earning potential. The rigor learned in my engineering training has definitely translated well to the business world.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;With 2 technical degrees the technical advancement path may be enhanced, while the business community may not be convinced the person has business chops; with a BS and MBA, the business community will probably be more accepting.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The issue is really the difficulty in crossing the technical / business barrier [especially] in the large multinationals.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;To understand the business best, start in a technical role, then shift to the business. It is very difficult to do the reverse.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Those who are technically trained can learn business management issues &#8230; Someone who has a business background cannot easily learn the chemstry/engineering/technology in a similar manner.&#8221;</p>
<p>WHATEVER THE DEGREE, ATTITUDE, APTITUDE and EXPERIENCE COUNT<br />
&#8220;In all cases, creativity, attitude, team building, ethic and results amount for far more than advanced degree specifics.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I have both &#8211; MBA from Rutgers BS and MS in Physics. I would say that nothing can jumpstart your career, these are just tools.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;With a technical undergrad degree, the advanced degree [MS, MBA] is ultimately less important than the would-be marketer’s curiosity, openness to new ideas and new approaches to business, and sensitivity to the motivations and intentions of key players in the marketplace.&#8221; </p>
<p>Some Linked-In Groups I&#8217;ve found especially useful: MARKETING INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS, MARKET RESEARCH BULLETIN, and MANAGEMENT CONSULTING JOBS.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s text of all the comments.<br />
<span id="more-192"></span><br />
<em>from MARKETING INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS<br />
In my limited experience I&#8217;d go for an MBA, but more than anything it seems experience is worth the most in this market.  Because marketing is often not a direct revenue generator, it has the most to prove with often the least amount of resources.  Hopefully your reader has weighed 2 years of experience and income vs. 2 years of school and expense. </p>
<p>Also, unless you can get into a top B school, I hear it really isn&#8217;t worth it unless you need to really build your business knowledge base. B school is all about the networking and Alumni network. Again this is not from personal experience<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
When I was considering the right graduate program for myself back in 1994, I looked at traditional MBA programs like Kellogg at Northwestern and hadn&#8217;t really considered an MS degree. However, I then learned about Northwestern&#8217;s MS graduate program Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC). This MS program was the right decision for me, as it was much more aligned with my personal customer-insight driven, strategic marketing background and career goals. In addition to gaining the core MBA-like foundation core courses such as finance and statistics, all of my remaining integrated marketing-related courses and consulting project work always included the gathering of market and customer data as the precursor to anything else we ever did. I was very satisfied with my decision then and still today. I only have my own experience to base my comment on, but I would think that you can&#8217;t just generalize that an MBA is always better than an MS, or vice versa. </p>
<p>Instead, I think you need to evaluate the specific school and MBA or MS program to make the right decision for your own unique career and situation. </p>
<p>MARKET RESEARCH BULLETIN<br />
While this may not be entirely relevant to someone with an engineering focus I can speak from the perspective of someone who has been in the market research business for 21 years and has both a Masters Degree (in Experimental Psychology) and a MBA (Marketing, Quantitative emphasis). I have found that while the MBA provided a general foundation for understanding the business world the technical skills I acquired in my Expeimental Psych Masters program are used on a daily basis as a researcher.  The psychology degree provided a wealth of knowledge in experimental design, statistics (parametric and non-parametric), quasi-experimental designs, etc. Pehaps the most valuable aspect that the focus was on human cognitive processing. This allowed for a very easy transition to applying statistical and experimental methods to consumers once I entered the MR field.<br />
When I have hired MR analysts I tend to favor those with a Masters level social science background as they understand that the basic unit of analysis is the consumer. They also, for those with Masters-level training, tend to have pretty good statistical and methodological training. </p>
<p>I would endorse having both degrees, if possible, but would lean more towards the MS degree for the greatest value in a market research role. This would be true for either a B2C or B2B role.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
I also have spent over 20 years in marketing research, and my undergraduate degree was in business. When I decided to return to school after many years away from the classroom, I felt I needed to have an MBA to be as competitive in the marketplace in terms of education as I was competitive in terms of years of work experience in the research industry. While I was finishing my MBA, I decided to continue my studies and complete an MS in Marketing. I believed that the MS with the marketing specialization would be a nice complement to the more general management MBA. What I have found is that I regularly utilize what I learned during my MS experience in my everyday work. I think the MS is a better alternative for support for marketing research.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
MS is more operation specific (MR/other research methodologies) and a general MBA is more holistic in nature.  MS is best suited for candidates with little or no work experience where as a general MBA is most effective after atleast 5 years of managerial work experience. </p>
<p>from MANAGEMENT CONSULTING JOBS<br />
I have both &#8211; MBA from Rutgers BS and MS in Physics. I would say that nothing can jumpstart your career, these are just tools. So which one depends on your preferences and your goal.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
I think it really depends on what you want to do with the degree and where you see your career heading. I added 2 MS degrees and a PhD to my engineering career before taking a U-Turn and pursuing an MBA. I would say that my MBA has broadened my career opportunities and earning potential. The rigor learned in my engineering training has definitely translated well to the business world. My PhD in engineering actually seems to be more valued in the business world than when I was a practicing engineer. </p>
<p>from CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES NETWORKING FORUM<br />
I got the MS, and then a marketing diploma, and am not sure that the full MBA would not have been better. However the MSc also opened doors, I would reccommend the MS, and then add business classes into your MS program- but have many friends who have done very well going B &#8211; MBA and rapidly rising in business based on the MBA -sp it really depends on whether you want to be a technical manager or a business manager, for the first I would do the MSc for the second the MBA<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
There is no wrong answer to this one. A Ch.E professor told me that the technical degrees were more valued, but his was of course his leaning. My observation is that, at least for the chemical industry, the issue is really the difficulty in crossing the technical / business barrier in the large multinationals. However, this is organization specific. The view that always made sense to me: To understand the business best, start in a technical role, then shift to the business. It is very difficult to do the reverse.</p>
<p>One added point, with 2 technical degrees the technical advancement path may be enhanced while the business community may not be convinced the person has business chops; with a BS and MBA, the technical community may not value the MBA but the business community will probably be more accepting. </p>
<p>Bottom line: to end up more easily in a business role, improve your business CV, and to advance tecnically concentrate on technical CV builders. </p>
<p>In all cases, creativity, attitude, team building, ethic and results amount for far more than advanced degree specifics.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
It has always been my firm belief that those who are technically trained can readily learn business management issues &#8211; either on their own or through changing roles in an organization. But someone who has a business background cannot easily learn the chemstry/engineering/technology in a similar manner. </p>
<p>Today, it seems that having an understanding of technical issues is becoming more valued, particularly at the higher management levels. Leading players in the industry seem to be more often than not selecting people with at least some technical background to fill key executive level positions. </p>
<p>My recommendation is definitely to get the scientific degree and add business experience as appropriate &#8211; whether through additional courses or simply through pushing for varying roles in the workplace.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
I have to agree with both Robert and Steven, espcially the part about the difficulty of crossing the technical / business frontier. Partly, I think that is the result of the organizational invisibility of most of the tech staff, and partly the bias of MBA educated management. </p>
<p>My experience and intuition suggest that, with a technical undergrad degree, the advanced degree is ultimately less important than the would-be marketer’s curiosity, openness to new ideas and new approaches to business, and sensitivity to the motivations and intentions of key players in the marketplace.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://market-intel.com/blog/2009/06/01/updated-ms-vs-mba/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.372 seconds -->

